Imagine you’re given a Rubik’s Cube, a symbol of complexity
and ingenuity, but without any prior knowledge of how it works or how to solve
it. You could twist and turn it randomly, hoping for the best. Maybe, through pure
chance, you stumble upon the solution. But does this make you a master of the
Rubik’s Cube? Unlikely.
Similarly, merely owning an Artificial Intelligence (AI)
model doesn't define you as an AI company.
"What truly constitutes an AI
company?" I found myself pondering this question again, following an
article I authored last year about adopting a Copernican mindset in
implementing AI (
link).
In that piece, I argued that a successful AI transformation
transcends technology. It's about a radical shift in mindset, culture, and
strategy. The 'what' and 'how' of AI only gain meaning when tied to a
substantial 'why'.
A prominent issue in AI transformations across many
organizations is not a scarcity of ideas, but rather a stark absence of
behavioural change. Traditional thinking and outdated infrastructure often act
as heavy anchors, pulling down potentially buoyant AI initiatives.
Sure, you could assemble a group of data scientists and
engineers and have them churn out machine learning algorithms in the corporate
basement. But does this transform you into an AI company? Not quite. The
defining factor of a remarkable AI company is its proficiency in the tasks AI
facilitates extraordinarily well.
What are the common traits of AI companies? Let’s review a
few.
Mastering the Art of Data Collection
AI companies excel in strategic data acquisition, drawing
from both internal and external sources. This is why many major consumer tech
companies maintain products that don't monetize directly but serve as data
acquisition tools to be monetized elsewhere. Some of the best AI companies
launch products knowing they won't generate direct revenue, but rather serve as
rich data mines.
Hierarchical Decentralization - Let the Experts Take the
Wheel
A striking characteristic of AI companies is their
inclination to delegate decision-making authority from the top levels of the C-suites to data scientists, engineers, and other specialized roles.
This approach diverges from traditional non-AI companies where key
decisions are monopolized by the C-suites, with the rest simply executing these decisions.
The hierarchical decision-making model is outdated in the AI era, as those working directly with technology have
the technical knowledge and understanding to make the most effective decisions.
As Steve Jobs so eloquently put it, “It doesn’t make sense to hire smart people
to tell them what to do, we hire them so they can tell us what to do."
Fostering Unified Data Systems: The Lifeblood of AI
AI companies thrive on unified data systems. An ecosystem
of fifty different databases managed by twenty different managers creates chaos
that no data team can untangle. Thus, many great AI companies preemptively
invest in consolidating their data into unified data lakes. This increases the
chances for their teams to connect the dots and allows data scientists and
analysts to focus on analyzing data rather than verifying it.
Embracing Automation
AI companies are adept at identifying automation
opportunities. Many tasks within companies are monotonous and don't contribute
significant value. AI companies excel in identifying such tasks and deploying
machine learning algorithms and ETL mapping to automate these processes,
thereby freeing up valuable human time for tasks that genuinely add value to
the business.
Emergence of AI-Related Roles
AI companies are known for cultivating new roles, including AI heads and managers, data scientists, and machine learning engineers. They also place a strong emphasis on AI ethics. These companies are innovative in their approach to task distribution among team members, ensuring that each role contributes effectively to the overall AI strategy.
AI
Documentation: The Roadmap to Accountability
Should you ever find yourself
questioning the worth of your data team's efforts spent on documentation, it's
certainly time to reconsider. The ability to understand what to document and
how to do it effectively is fast becoming a crucial skill for AI teams. As the
storm of Generative AI sweeps across the AI field, the need for regulation in
the industry has never been more apparent.
Traditional software documentation,
while useful, doesn't quite cut it when it comes to providing the necessary
evidence for auditors. And while we're still waiting for AI-specific guidelines
to emerge, the recent movement by the European Union underscores the importance
of documenting AI systems. It's about more than just ticking boxes - it's about
fostering transparency, promoting accountability, and enhancing our
understanding of these complex systems.
Conclusion
The transformation to an AI company is an ongoing journey,
not a destination. It's a paradigm shift that continually evolves the
organization’s mindset.
Rushing to ride the wave of generative AI and showcasing
tools like ChatGPT doesn't necessarily transform your company into an AI
entity. Becoming a truly AI-driven company requires a deeper change that
permeates the entire organizational structure.
Unfortunately, some C-suite executives have unrealistic expectations of AI, often pressuring data teams to deliver results that go beyond what today’s technology can do—or what the company’s resources can support.
The tendency of the media and academic literature to only
highlight AI successes, without mentioning failures, often fosters a misguided
belief that AI can do everything. The reality is, it can't. To
learn more about the challenges AI hasn't overcome, check out this post:
link.